Make your own free website on Tripod.com
| Home | Generals Deman Rumsfeld Resignation | UN Report on Iraq Torture | Chavez UN Speech, calls Bush Devil | Generals Demand Rumsfeld Resignation | More Torture Now Than Under Saddam Hussein--UN Report | KIDS & BIG PHARMA--Huffington | HOW BRAZIL BECAME OIL SELF-SUFFICIENT | ISRAEL'S PURCHASE OF 2 MORE SUBS FOR NUCLEAR MISSLES | Katarina Warnings--Palast | President Rated Worst in History | Israel Attacks on Palestine | Lebanon War a Failure for Israel
HOW BRAZIL BECAME OIL SELF-SUFFICIENT

Political News--August & September of 06

U.S. ENERGY POLICY SUCKS

 

 

In the seventies with the energy crunch and prices skyrocketing, the U.S. government adopted a policy which encourage energy self-sufficiency.   Among the more obvious results where a proliferation of solar panels on roofs for pools and hot water, the reporting of energy efficiency on major appliances and incentives for buy economy cars.  That has all evaporated, as our energy policy has in the last two decades been carved out by the automakers and the oil industry.  The first three articles arer on ethanol and Brazil’s success, followed by one from Scientific American, which is illustrative of how much clout the oil industry has on energy policy.  To make matters worse Americans have elected as President a representative from the oil industry, one which has strong ties to the house of Saud--jk. 

 

EDITOR'S NOTE

U.S. should follow Brazil's lead in flex-fuel technology

By Mimi Whitefield

mwhitefield@MiamiHerald.com

 

Miami Herald Aug 14, 2006

News last week that a crucial BP oil pipeline in Alaska had been shut down due to corrosion sent gasoline prices to more than $3 a gallon -- again.  With tensions in the Middle East, potential terror plots foiled but still a danger, and the threat that one of this season's hurricanes could slam Gulf Coast oil refineries, this country has plenty of reasons to worry about petroleum supplies.  Yet Americans are continuing their gas-guzzling ways. True, there have been efforts to produce hybrid cars, but they're expensive and represent a fraction of overall auto production.

Hawaii, which has the nation's highest gas prices, is offering tax credits for companies that produce ethanol. And other states have experimented with biodiesel fuel.  But there's no strong, consistent national program encouraging consumers and auto manufacturers to really embrace alternatives to gasoline power.

This week's cover story, ''In the Driver's Seat,'' (page 22) by Martha Brannigan, is a portrait of Maureen Kempston Darkes, a Miramar-based executive who just happens to be the highest ranking woman at General Motors Corp.  She's in charge of a huge territory that stretches from Latin America to the Middle East and acrosss Africa.  Among the operations she oversees is the GM plant in Sao Caetano do Sul, Brazil, which has been a leader in flex-fuel technology (see page 23).

The flex-fuel system allows cars to run on gasoline, ethanol or a mixture of the two in the same tank.  Brazil has long been a leader in producing cars that run on ethanol made from sugar cane.  With encouragement from the Brazilian government, carmakers in South America's largest country have been producing ethanol-powered vehicles since the late 1970s. At one point in the mid-1980s -- when I was living in Brazil -- about two-thirds of the cars produced in the country ran on ethanol.  But Brannigan, a former Wall Street Journal reporter who spends her time between Coral Gables and Brazil, says ethanol shortages and volatile price swings began turning Brazilian drivers off, spurring auto makers to search for another solution.

Enter the flex-fuel technology.  Introduced in 2003, flex-fuel has proved so popular that, by the end of this year, nearly all new cars produced in Brazil will be capable of running on a combination of gasoline and ethanol.  Another factor that makes a flex-fuel system feasible is that ethanol is available at most service stations in Brazil. In contrast, there are only about 700 ethanol pumps in the United States.

Perhaps the United States as a whole can learn from this Brazilian example.  The most powerful nation in the world still remains far too dependent on foreign oil. Let's make searching for and exploiting alternative fuels a priority. 

Mimi Whitefield is the editor of Business Monday. E-mail her at mwhitefield@Miami Herald.com

 

Flexible-fuel vehicle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Flexible-fuel vehicles in the United States

North American vehicles from approximately 1980 onward can run on 10% ethanol/90% gasoline (i.e., E10) with no modifications. Prior to 1980, many cars imported into the United States contained rubber, aluminium, and other materials that were generally non-compatible with any ethanol in their fuel delivery systems, and these cars experienced problems when E10 was first introduced.Cars made in the US from the late 1970's onward can run on E10 with no modifications. E10 fuel is widely available. Going beyond 10% ethanol generally requires special engineering.

In the United States, many flexible-fuel vehicles can accept up to 85% ethanol (E85) or up to 85% methanol (M85). The fuel mixture is automatically detected by one or more sensors, and once detected, the ECU tunes the timing of spark plugs and fuel injectors so that the fuel will burn cleanly in the vehicle's internal combustion engine. Originally, sensors in both the fuel-line and in the exhaust system were used for flexible fuel vehicles. In recent years, manufacturers have instead opted to use only the oxygen (lambda) sensor in the exhaust manifold, before the catalytic converter, and to eliminate the fuel inline sensor. This fuel inline sensor was removed in model year 1998: DaimlerChrysler; 2001: Ford and 2006: GM. As E85 and M85 are more corrosive, special fuel system materials are also required. Some manufacturers also require a special motor oil be used, particularly in vehicles using methanol fuel.

In 1993 through 1995, Ford offered the first production M85 FFV option on the 3.0L engine in the Taurus while Chrysler offered M85 flexible-fuel versions of the Dodge Spirit and Plymouth Acclaim with an MPFI 2.5 L 4-cylinder engine. FFV Chrysler minivans were also offered beginning around the same time, with a version of the corporate 3.3 L V6 engine. With the introduction of the Taurus re-design for 1996, Ford complemented the M85 FFV Taurus, sold mainly in California, with the first production E85 FFV using the same 3.0L engine in the Taurus and offering these for sale in most of the rest of the country. In 1998, General Motors Corporation introduced their first light truck (an S10, with 2.2L engine) in a flexible-fuel configuration. In 1999, Ford Motor Company introduced a flexible-fuel option on its 2000 Ford Ranger pickup trucks, and it has also continued to be an option on the company's Taurus model. For 2000, Ford also made their 4.0L SOHC engine found in the Explorer FFV capable and introduced it in the re-designed United States Postal Service delivery truck, which was based on a Ford Explorer chassis and powertrain in 2000 and 2001. Ford later extended this FFV powertrain to the consumer market with the E85 FFV Ford Explorer and Explorer Sport Trac, but phased it out with the new Explorer re-design in 2006. In that year, Ford began offering the 4.6L V8 version of the F-150 with E85 FFV capability for consumers and fleets. During the summer of 2006, Toyota officials stated that their company would consider FFV vehicle production in the future. Other manufacturers such as Mercedes-Benz also offer E85/Flexible fuel vehicles. Flexible fuel vehicles are often identified as such by exterior badging, such as Ford's "road-and-leaf" badge introduced in 1993 and still used on Ford FFV and HEV (hybrid electric vehicle) models. They can also be identified by labelling adjacent to the fuel filler and fuel gauge, and by the engine identifier digit in the VIN.

As of 2005, most existing vehicles that are available to the public with flex-fuel engines are sport-utility vehicles or others in the "light truck" class. Sedans, wagons, and others are usually only available in flexible-fuel configurations as part of fleet vehicle purchases by companies. Starting in 2006, though, more widespread availability is planned for standard models intended for non-fleet sales.

A 1988 federal law provides an incentive for creating flexible fuel vehicles in the form of credits that can be used to relax Corporate Average Fuel Economy fuel efficiency standards. It is alleged that this efficiency relaxation has decreased overall US fleet efficiency, thereby resulting in increased nationwide fuel consumption.[1]

Over 4 million flexible-fuel vehicles are currently operated on the road in America, although a 2002 study found that less than 1% of fuel consumed by these vehicles is E85[2

 

 

Brazil fights oil prices with alcohol

Sales of 'Flex' cars that run on alcohol or gasoline surpassed August sales of gasoline-only vehicles.

| Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

Brazilians aren't waiting for high-priced hybrid cars.

The Christian Science Monitor from the October 07, 2005 edition

Drivers are fighting rising gasoline prices by buying "flex" or "flexible fuel" cars that slurp more alcohol. Alcohol made from sugar cane is becoming the fuel of choice in Brazil, and other countries - so much so that global sugar prices hit a seven-year high this week.  Regular car engines will run fine on a 10 percent blend of alcohol and gasoline. But by using computer sensors that adjust to whatever mix is in the tank, flex car engines run on either ethanol, gasoline, or any combination of the two. And they have been roaring out of dealerships here since Volkswagen sold the first TotalFlex Golf in March 2003.

Today, flex cars are outselling traditional gasoline models. In August, 62 percent of new cars sold were flex, according to industry numbers. "Demand has been unbelievable," says Barry Engle, the new president of Ford Brasil. "I am hard-pressed to think of any other technology that has been such a success so quickly."  As many countries reexamine their dependence on petroleum fields for fuel, Brazil offers a model for how to make the switch to cane, beet, wheat, or corn fields. The successful transition here comes down to many factors, but price is the primary one, experts say.

Unlike hybrids sold in the US, for example, flex cars sold in Brazil don't cost any more than traditional models. In fact, some models are only available with flex engines now. Ethanol engines use 25 percent more ethanol per mile than gasoline. But ethanol (the alcohol produced by fermenting sugar) usually sells at somewhere between a third to half of the price of gas. Even people who were reluctant to take the plunge and buy a flex say they have been won over by the savings.

"It's been a revelation because of the economy," says Madalena Lira, a university lecturer who says that she and her husband had reluctantly purchased a flex car because it was the only available version of the Fiat Palio Weekend they wanted. "I love this car in spite of it being a flex, not because it is a flex. The savings have been great. I'd certainly buy another one."

In addition to the savings, environmentally conscious drivers appreciate having a car that runs on a cleaner fuel, and some might even buy a flex car because they know it is good for the country's auto and sugar manufacturers. But today, two-and-a-half years into the flex experiment, another unforeseen advantage is emerging.  "There is something curious that we are just starting to see," says Alfred Szwarc, an ethanol consultant with Sao Paulo's sugar cane association. "Gasoline powered cars lose more of their [resale] value than flex cars. People know that oil is finite and that it is going to get more and more expensive. They think that a gasoline-powered car is going to be more difficult to sell. They see flex cars as the car of the future."

Ethanol-powered cars are not new in Brazil. In a bid to cut the country's reliance on foreign oil imports and help their own sugar producers, Brazil's military government pushed alcohol-powered cars in the early 1980s. Gas stations across the country added ethanol pumps to the existing gasoline and diesel ones. Between 1983 and 1988 more than 88 percent of cars sold annually were running on a blend of ethanol and gasoline.  This didn't last for long, though. The subsidies were withdrawn at the end of the decade, and cane farmers quickly realized they could get more from selling sugar than turning it into ethanol. When alcohol fuel shortages ensued it looked like the end of the road for ethanol engines as sales of the experimental cars plummeted.

That experience may have been a bitter one but it gave Brazilians a taste for alternative fuels that lingered. Although most people abandoned ethanol cars, many taxi drivers kept them because it was so much cheaper than a gas-only car. Then the country's Congress passed a law forcing oil companies to add small quantities of ethanol to their gasoline. That prompted car companies to experiment with an engine that would run on both fuels, and when they did, the flex car sales took off.  "Why did this take off here?" asks Mr. Engle. "Because this isn't brand-new. Car buyers concerned about high gas prices or potential ethanol shortages no longer have to make a choice between the two. It used to be an either-or but now there's both and that gives consumers peace of mind and explains why Brazilians have embraced it."

The next task is convincing other nations to adopt the technology, industry experts said. With oil prices at a record high, there is a clear advantage to diluting gasoline or even substituting it, with sugar-based ethanol or one of the biofuel alternatives such as beets or corn.  For most countries, the problem is the lack of ethanol production and a distribution system. Although many countries require oil companies to dilute their gasoline with ethanol (in Brazil, gas sold at the pumps is 25 percent ethanol; and some of the gas sold in the US, China, Australia and Canada is 10-15 percent ethanol), few actually make ethanol or manufacture flex vehicles, and even fewer have a network of gas stations with ethanol pumps.  In the US - with about 4 million flex cars - there are 14 states without even one ethanol pump, says Robert White, project director for the National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition.

With years of experience at every stage of the process, Brazil is in the pole position to help other nations' farmers grow crops, scientists refine it into fuel, or engineers produce the technology to make flex cars, says Rogelio Golfarb, president of Brazil's car makers association. "There is an enormous demand from abroad to know more," Mr. Golfarb says "This is an advantage and an opportunity for Brazil."  

 

Running on Empty

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN MAGAZINE, DEC. 05, P. 8

It was a remarkable turnabout. In September, after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita pushed gasoline prices to more than $3 a gallon, President George W. Bush spoke out for energy conservation. The president, who had previously insisted that new oil wells and refineries were the solution to the nation's energy woes, called on Americans to save gas by driving less. Listeners with long memories recalled President Jim­my Carter's television appear­ances during the oil crisis of the 1970s, when he urged Americans to turn down their thermostats. The only thing missing was the cozy cardigan that Carter had worn when he made his plea.

 

Environmentalists, though, were less than thrilled by the Bush administration's new strat­egy, which focused on public-service advertisements encouraging conservation. When it comes to transportation, which consumes 70 percent of U.S. oil and generates a third of the nation's carbon emissions, voluntary measures may be ineffec­tive. Decades of suburban sprawl and neglect of pub­lic transit have made it harder for Americans to cut back on driving; from 1990 to 2001, the average length of a shopping trip grew from five to seven miles, and the number of shopping trips per household rose from 341 to 496 a year. Driving to schools, churches, doc­tors and vacation spots also increased significantly.

 

A more constructive approach would be to im­prove the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks. The rise in gas prices has prompted some movement in this direc­tion: after the hurricanes disrupted the oil industry, car buyers shunned gas-guzzling SUVs and snapped up more efficient models. This trend, however, may prove short-lived if gas prices subside as oil companies rebuild their facilities. For this reason, some econo­mists recommend raising the federal gas tax by 50 cents a gallon. The increase could be gradually im­posed as prices at the pump decline, so that the impact on consumers is minimized. To offset the dispropor­tionate burden on working-class drivers, revenues from the gas tax could be used to reduce payroll taxes.

 

Unfortunately, Bush and Congress are adamantly opposed to any new tax, even one that would protect the environment, lessen our dependence on oil from the Middle East and save consumers money in the long run. Instead the Bush administration has pro­posed revising the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards for light trucks, a category that includes SUVs, pickup trucks and minivans. Whereas passenger cars must average 27.5 miles per gallon, the required average for light trucks is now 21 mpg and scheduled to rise to 22.2 mpg by the 2007 model year. The administration's proposal divides light trucks into six subcategories; although small SUVs have to average 28.4 mpg by 2011, the target for big pickups is only 21.3 mpg. The average for all light trucks would rise to 24 mpg, just 8 percent more than what the current CAFE rules would require by then.

Such feeble measures will do little to ease Ameri­ca's addiction to foreign oil or slow the global warm­ing caused by vehicle exhaust. Lawmakers should press for more stringent CAFE standards that would boost fuel economy for both cars and light trucks by at least 40 percent over the next decade. The goal is technologically feasible—by adopting hybrid engines and strong but lightweight auto bodies, manufactur­ers can make their vehicles more efficient without compromising passenger safety or inflating sticker prices. What we need are political leaders genuinely committed to energy conservation, not just to speech­es and public-service ads.

Enter supporting content here