Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Nicaraguans vote for Sandinistans

People's Socialist Movements

Home | Gaddafi the populist socialist | Socialist President elected in Ecuador | Nicaraguans vote for Sandinistans | Leftist Wins in Ecuador | Humanitarian World Trade | Mexico, 1 Million Demonstrate Over Election Fraud, 9/16/06 | Pro-business Bureaucracy & Venezuelan Socialism | Nepal: socialist movement fights monarchy | Chiness workers riot | Nepal Moaist Movement

Quite a bit early to celebrate, for the Sandinistas have formed a broad political alliance with conservatives.  This will likely result in policies similar to that of the government of Brazil, which has disappointed the peasants--jk.

 

From Greenleft.org.au

 

 

NICARAGUA

Nicaraguans’ vote for Ortega shows identification with ’79 revolution

Phil Cournoyer

2 December 2006


Nicaragua’s Sandinistas will never forget the night of November 5 and the four days of street celebrations that followed. The first official results of the election came in around 11pm. They foretold that Daniel Ortega, presidential candidate of the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN), would win on the first round. Partisans of the Sandinista movement, which led the popular revolution of 1979, had waited 16 long, trying years for this day, ever since the Sandinista government went down to bitter defeat in February 1990.

Across the country, hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets in jubilation. The celebrations went on for days, until it was clear that all the main political forces contending the election, especially Washington, would accept the FSLN victory. In towns and cities across the country, people danced, chanted, and mobilized to express their determination that no one should deny them their victory. Faced with this popular outpouring, the US and their cronies here backed away from their initial efforts to question the legitimacy of the vote.

Assurances to imperialism

The mood of these celebrations was rather different from that of Ortega’s campaign, which sought to distance itself from the heritage of the Sandinista revolution. To win more support, the FSLN formed a broad convergence of political forces, baptised as United Nicaragua will Triumph (
Unida, Nicaragua Triunfa). It included capitalist politicians from other parties, ex-Contras (the name given to the counter-revolutionary forces organised and supplied by the US
to make war against the 1979 revolution), and the Miskito indigenous people’s party YATAMA (based in the Caribbean Coast Autonomous Regions).

Ortega’s running mate for vice-president was Jaime Morales Carazo, former chief negotiator for the Contras and longtime wheeler-dealer of the PLC (Constitutional Liberal Party), a traditional bourgeois party. The program of this alliance was packaged as “Government Program for Reconciliation and National Unity”. Ortega pledged to keep
Nicaragua in the US-sponsored Central American Free Trade Agreement and to abide by Nicaragua
’s international commitments to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). He also assured the business sector than his “national unity” government would fully respect private property and would block any moves towards land occupations.

The FSLN leadership emphasised its rapprochement with Cardinal Obando y Bravo and new, warm relations with the Catholic Church. The church hierarchy exacted a high price for their embrace — FSLN support for a new law banning therapeutic abortion (performed when the pregnant woman’s life is in danger; women have had this right in
Nicaragua since 1891). Both Daniel Ortega and his wife (and campaign manager) Rosario Murillo have recently become outspoken advocates of the Catholic faith and they suffused their electoral appeal with religious themes and symbols.

Nonetheless, the FSLN proposed to involve
Nicaragua in such Latin American-wide efforts as the Venezuelan-sponsored ALBA (the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas: an institution that champions fair economic and social relations among its members — Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia
). Ortega used the campaign to condemn “savage capitalism”, calling on voters to oust the national oligarchy from power and elect a “government of the poor”. The theme song of the campaign was John Lennon’s “Give Peace a Chance” with modified Spanish lyrics — “all we are asking is jobs and peace”. The main official slogans were “By voting FSLN you win”, “FSLN, a preferential option for the poor”, and “Reconciliation, peace, jobs, wellbeing”.

That was enough to provide Sandinista voters with an opening to deliver a message.

Message from the masses

Although the FSLN alliance chose pink as its election colour, every rally evidenced a sea of red and black flags — the colours of Augusto Sandino (the revolutionary national hero of Nicaragua), the long struggle of the FSLN, and of the 1979 revolution — in the hands of enthusiastic supporters. And everywhere they chanted “The people united will never be defeated!”

The election outcome was a telling blow to the
US and the pro-imperialist forces in Nicaragua. Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia — among other anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist forces across Latin America
— immediately hailed the FSLN victory.

Final results showed that Ortega won the presidency with 38% of the vote, well above the criteria for a first-ballot victory (35% of the vote and a minimum 5% lead over the runner-up).

Four other party alliances contended the elections: the Nicaraguan Liberal Alliance (ALN — backed by
Washington
); the PLC (controlled by former president Arnoldo Aleman); the Sandinista Renewal Movement (MRS); and the Alternative for Change Alliance (AC) led by former Contra leader Eden Pastora. The ALN won 28.3%, the PLC 27.11%, the MRS 6.3% and the AC 0.29%. Results for deputies to the National Assembly and the Central American Parliament were similar.

The election left no doubt that the incoming administration is a minority force in the country. Daniel Ortega and the FSLN caucus will have to negotiate with other parties in the National Assembly to carry out their policies.

US meddling

The
US government, the imperial ambassador in Managua
(Paul Triveli), and the US Republican Party fought hard to block Ortega from taking the presidency. They missed no opportunity to warn Nicaraguans of the dire consequences of failing to back their candidate, the ALN’s Eduardo Montealegre.

Their intimidation crusade included threatening to block migrant family remittances (on which Nicaragua is now economically dependent), tourist advisory warnings, and efforts to cudgel the two pro-imperialist parties — PLC and ALN — into unity. The
US even withdrew visas from recalcitrant leaders and members of the PLC. Millions of dollars flowed from the US
to grease the wheels of a vicious anti-Sandinista campaign.

Despite this intimidation, the Sandinista movement improved slightly on its traditional core vote of around 41%-42%. But Sandinista support was now divided between two electoral alliances: FSLN and MRS. The dissident Sandinista alliance — the MRS — won fewer votes than expected (6% of the presidential vote; and up to 14% for their parliamentary candidates in some provinces). Nonetheless, Sandinistas entered and emerged from the elections as a divided force.

The MRS Alliance was formed through a convergence of forces who left the FSLN in splits or expulsions since 1995 with other political currents such as the old Nicaraguan Socialist Party (PSN, once the pro-Moscow force here).

The MRS candidate was Edmundo Jarquin, a former official of the Interamerican Development Bank (BID) who had served as Nicaraguan ambassador to
Mexico under the former Sandinista government. The MRS had originally nominated Herty Lewites, the popular Sandinista mayor of Managua
. Lewites died last July, and was replaced by Jarquin, his running mate. The immensely popular Nicaraguan musician, singer, and composer Carlos Meji Godoy ran as vice-presidential candidate.

Sandinista ‘renewal’

The MRS campaign distinguished itself from the FSLN mainly in terms of a shrill and relentless attack on Daniel Ortega. It condemned Ortega for corruption and totalitarianism, for the FSLN’s 1999 pact with the PLC, and for allegedly accepting support from
Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Cuba’s Fidel Castro. The MRS alliance accepted money from the US Republican Party to train its electoral workers and met with visiting US senators. It accepted without protest the US characterization that it was an “acceptable democratic alternative” to the “anti-democratic pact” parties — the FSLN and the PLC. The MRS leader and other candidates seemed to believe that this seal of approval from Washington
would somehow help their cause.

The MRS refused to pledge support to the FSLN in the case of a second-round vote — which cost it the support of some Sandinistas.

The MRS Alliance contains a current, the Democratic Left led by Monica Baltodano, that has articulated the need for a socialist alternative for the
Americas
. Baltodano and her co-thinkers joined forces with the MRS as a tactical move to help advance that perspective. However, the MRS Alliance itself shied away from any identification with anti-imperialist or anti-capitalist policies, maintaining a centre-liberal orientation that remains programmatically indistinguishable from the FSLN, except on the important question of women’s right to therapeutic abortion services.

Many observers from the national and international left have noted that there was really no “left” option in the Nicaraguan elections. This is a valid appreciation if “left” is taken to mean pro-socialist. However, the combined FSLN-MRS vote indicates that a significant 44% of the population continue to identify with the heritage of the Sandinista revolution and used the elections to express defiance of imperialist arrogance and power. Even PLC voters expressed indignation over US attempts to sideline their party.

Formidable challenge

The incoming Ortega government and the FSLN are now faced with formidable challenges. They will take over the reins of an impoverished country.

When the pro-US coalition defeated the FSLN in a national election in 1990, both international and national capitalist pundits predicted that
Nicaragua would grow economically and would soon overcome the devastation and hardship brought on by eight years of the US-orchestrated Contra war. But the new order inflicted even worse on the country. Since 1990, 2 million people have joined the ranks of the poor. Four out of every five Nicaraguans (more than 4.2 million people) live on less than $2 a day. Fifteen per cent of the population migrated to the US, Costa Rica
, and other Central American countries in search of work. As the country’s principal export, these mainly young workers sent over $1 billion last year in remittances to their families here. The country is now dependent on those payments and on international donations and loans.

Illiteracy, which the 1979 revolution had managed to reduce to less than 13%, has now climbed to 34%. Expenditures in health, education, and other public services have declined; both the health and educational system are in tatters. In 1989, despite the economic embargo and devastation of the war, the Sandinista government invested $35 per person annually in health services. By 2005, health spending had declined to $16 per person

Although some economic indicators have turned positive in recent years, this has only increased concentration of wealth in the hands of the oligarchy and upper middle classes. [for world bank and IMF policy] According to the United Nations Human Development Report for 2005, the poorest 10% of
Nicaragua’s population dispose of just 0.9% of the nation’s wealth, in contrast to 44.7% consumed by the richest 10%.

During these years of defeat, Nicaraguan working people have been unable to mount effective resistance.

Nicaragua’s new president has appealed to both sides of the class divide in the country. He has assured the international “community” (read: capital) and local bankers and oligarchs that they have nothing to fear from the incoming government. At the same time, he has maintained that he will carry out his commitments to Nicaragua
’s poor and dispossessed classes.

Workers, farmers, indigenous people and the young expect a lot from the incoming government. They expect improvements in the education system and government support for a massive campaign to reduce illiteracy. People want access to improved and affordable health services. Farmers demand affordable credits to purchase necessary inputs and passable roads to get crops to market. People everywhere are demanding an end to repeated power cuts and to steep increases in water and electricity costs. They want to block privatisation of water and return the electrical system to public ownership. More and more communities are demanding effective measures to protect their environment.

Several of the main unions of the country have put president-elect Ortega and the FSLN on notice that they will press ahead with the same demands they made against the outgoing government, most notably in the health and education sectors.

Women and human rights supporters both here and internationally will not let the incoming government sweep the issue of their right to therapeutic abortion under the rug of the presidential palace.

Indigenous people will continue to press for settlement of their communal land claims and to put teeth into laws guaranteeing real autonomy for the
Caribbean Coast regions. They are watching closely events in Bolivia and are in touch with indigenous forces there. They are less likely than ever to accept yet another long postponement of their demands and permanent denial of their right to dignity and full participation in Nicaragua
society. (The FSLN’s main ally on the Coast is the most influential indigenous party, YATAMA.)

With
Venezuela or Washington?


The FSLN government thus faces some challenging questions:

* How can Nicaragua both comply with the economic policies dictated by the IMF and backed by local capitalists, and make good on improvements in the standard of living of formal and informal workers, farmers, and marginalised sectors?
* How can the incoming FSLN government both deepen its commitments to free trade with the
US and other Central American countries, and also bring the country into a framework of collaboration with anti-imperialist governments in Cuba, Venezuela, and elsewhere? Cooperation with Cuba will be vital in efforts to improve public health services. Nicaragua desperately needs to firm up agreements with Venezuela for cheaper petroleum products and oil, and to take advantage of its offer of long-term, low interest credit and even to accept payment with agricultural and other products. Venezuela already has such agreements with Cuba and other Caribbean
and Latin American countries.

* Will Nicaragua set out to reclaim its sovereignty and independence, or will it deepen its ties and dependence on
US
imperialism?

* Will it recognise the People’s Republic of
China, or maintain its ties with the imposter regime in Taiwan
in return for more investments in tax-free sweatshop zones?

Already the FSLN has sent high-level delegations to
Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and other Latin American countries. At the same time, high-level talks have been held with the IMF and the International Development Bank. US
ambassador Paul Triveli now says he is willing to talk with Ortega, and no doubt such conversations will take place — salami style, if Triveli gets his way.

Pro-imperialist forces in
Nicaragua, not to speak of the Bush administration, are trying to block the FSLN from carrying out any aspects of an anti-imperialist policy, such as joining ALBA or making an oil deal with Venezuela
. Prominent right-wing commentators, politicians and business leaders here have issued strong statements warning against such a course.

Si se puede!

The outcome of this tug-of-war depends not only on the will of the FSLN leadership or only on forces within
Nicaragua. It also depends on how the coming confrontation between the US and Venezuela plays out, how developments relating to Cuba
unfold, and on wider international issues.

Nicaragua
’s impoverished masses will have their say, too, in all this. The election has raised their hopes and inspired many with a new sense of confidence that “si se puede” (“yes, we can do it”).

Looking further down the road, it is clear that Sandinistas are challenged to reclaim our heritage, to find a way to recommit ourselves to the historic program of Carlos Fonseca, and to link up to a growing worldwide movement for socialism now being spearheaded by
Venezuela and Cuba
.

Whether the FSLN itself can be won back to this course cannot be foretold. Those committed to a socialist course will no doubt have different tactical approaches, particularly with respect to where to devote key forces — in the FSLN or the MRS, and/or elsewhere.

Our challenge is to find as many points of unity as possible in the daily struggles of workers, farmers, students, and women to defend and advance their rights. Sandinista renewal can be achieved only in ongoing struggle in defence of the class, ethnic, social, and national interests of the oppressed and exploited sectors of the population. These interests include the need to defend
Venezuela, Cuba and Bolivia against US harassment and attack. Opposition to all imperialist wars like those being waged against Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine
also forms a vital component of our ongoing struggle.

People feel that they have won a new opening in this election, the chance for a new course. That could become real. But only if we seize the opening and hold the new government to account. Business as usual is not an option for the poor, the jobless, and the oppressed. We keep on chanting Sandino vive, la lucha sigue! El pueblo unido, jamás será vencido! (Sandino lives, the struggle goes on! The people united will never be defeated!)

[Phil Cournoyer has been active in the Marxist movement since the late 1950s. He has lived in
Nicaragua
since the mid-1980s and is a Nicaraguan citizen and member of the FSLN. He is a contributing editor of Socialist Voice. For Part 2 of this two-part article, see Nicaragua: the FSLN’s Evolution Since 1990.. Economic and social indicators cited in this article are taken from Oscar-Rene Vargas, Nicaragua: el fracaso neoliberal.]


From: International News, Green Left Weekly issue #693
6 December 2006.

 

 

“Ortega pledged to keep Nicaragua in the US-sponsored Central American Free Trade Agreement and to abide by Nicaragua’s international commitments to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). He also assured the business sector than his “national unity” government would fully respect private property and would block any moves towards land occupations” (above). Assuming these promises to be sincere, and given his vice-president’s role in a pro-business political party, this isn’t a victory for the masses or socialism—jk. 

NICARAGUA

Nicaraguan voters defy US threats

 

Nicole Colson

10 November 2006


Despite a relentless campaign by the Bush administration to derail his election, Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega won Nicaragua’s November 5 presidential election.

Ortega, the candidate of the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) and the country’s president from 1985 to 1990, won almost 40% of the vote in his race against four other candidates. That was more than enough to avoid a runoff against the US-backed candidate, Harvard-educated banker Eduardo Montealegre.

For weeks, US officials pulled out all the stops to try to derail Ortega’s victory, including pressuring the country’s right-wing parties to come together behind a single candidate. But when conservatives remained divided between Montealegre and ruling party candidate Jose Rizo, the
US
turned to making dark threats in the event of an Ortega victory.

US ambassador Paul Trivelli warned Nicaraguans not to vote for Ortega, promising some “surprises” in the run-up to the election. Republican member of Congress Dana Rohrabacher threatened an economic embargo against the impoverished country, while other politicians warned that the US might take action to block Nicaraguans living in the US from sending money home to Central America
’s poorest country.

But if anything, the anti-Ortega rhetoric and threats may have prompted more Nicaraguans — particularly the poor — to vote for Ortega as a protest against US intervention.

Historically, the US not only propped up the brutal dictatorship of Anastazio Somoza, it also funded and armed the right-wing paramilitary contras, who carried out a bloody war against the left-wing Sandinista government following Somoza’s overthrow in 1979.

The Bush administration even sent former White House aide Oliver North — best-known for his role in organising the secret illegal funding and arming of the contras during the Reagan administration — to warn Nicaraguans that an Ortega government would be faced with the cut-off of the country’s estimated US$220 million in annual aid.

“Imagine Osama bin Laden visiting the
United States 10 or 15 years from now”, wrote Mark Weisbrot, a Latin America
expert at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, “telling Americans who to vote for if they want to avoid getting hurt”.

Today, Ortega insists that he is a “pragmatist” in favour of “reconciliation”. That was evident during his campaign, when he chose Jaime Morales — a former political opponent and contra supporter — as his running mate.

Ortega has also held back from criticising the
US
, and promised that he would not institute drastic reforms that would threaten business interests.

In the days leading up to the election, he supported a vote for a ban pushed by the Catholic Church outlawing all abortions, even when a woman’s life is in danger. The measure passed.

Despite this, Ortega’s victory is worrying to the
US for a number of reasons — especially his ties to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. “Though Ortega … is a pale shadow of his former self, having jettisoned his leftist rhetoric and hostility towards his northern neighbor, nevertheless, Washington must now recognize that it has patently failed to isolate Chavez diplomatically”, wrote author Nikolas Kozloff in an article on the CounterPunch website. “Ortega will be hampered in bringing about radical change, but will at least look upon Venezuela
as an important regional ally and friend.”

[From the
US
Socialist Worker, newspaper of the International Socialist Organization. Visit Socialistworker.org>.]


From: International News, Green Left Weekly issue #690
15 November 2006.

 

 

For more articles of a similar flavor